Amount of deduction of tds

In case of short / excess deductions, you can adjust with subsequent payments. So in case of payments made within the same FY can be set-off and shown as total deduction against total payments  for that year.

But in case of different years, the payments are treated separately. Although, you can still adjust the short deduction from subsequent payment from the excess amount deducted earlier by quoting the Challan No. in the return. 

Assessee is correct in its arguments

Hi Anshul,

Deductor is in correct at his point ,  has to  rectify his mistake done in FY 2010-11.

No. it is not true in any sense, being over deduction of TDS in FY 2010-11 will Increase deductees Income for that year where as less deduction of TDS in FY 2011-12 will show less income than the bill presented, in my opinion it must be changed accordingly if deductee has any objection.

In my opinion assessee is not true at all, TDS return will not reflect true matter, it will result wrong income will be shown at 26AS of deductee..... hope further the whole matter understood.

agree with jalpesh

I am not agree with Jalpesh. When Tds return was filled the income on which Tds was deducted was shown Rs. 1,00,000/- and Tds was shown Rs. 5,000/-. It means Tds was deducted at wrong rate at 5% (5000/100000*100) instead of at 2%. so the rate of deduction of Tds was wrong and never the income shown was wrong. The same was reflected in 26AS. So the income was rightly shown in 26AS.

In this case assessee was right he can adjust short deduction of subseqent year (i.e. 2011-12) from excess deduction of earlier year (i.e 2010-11) by quoting challan number in Tds return.

Originally posted by : JAY PARIKH
	I am not agree with Jalpesh. When Tds return was filled the income on which Tds was deducted was shown Rs. 1,00,000/- and Tds was shown Rs. 5,000/-. It means Tds was deducted at wrong rate at 5% (5000/100000*100) instead of at 2%. so the rate of deduction of Tds was wrong and never the income shown was wrong. The same was reflected in 26AS. So the income was rightly shown in 26AS. In this case assessee was right he can adjust short deduction of subseqent year (i.e. 2011-12) from excess deduction of earlier year (i.e 2010-11) by quoting challan number in Tds return.

Dear Jay,

I do not bother for the thing whether you agree with me or not, but I would simply suggest prepare the TDS return of TDS deductor, you will come to know the facts, where excess deduction of TDS department do not bother, whereas in this case when you will show less deduction of TDS, it will generate default of the same. Hope, understood my point of veiw.

Regards