Manager Finance
67 Points
Posted on 22 June 2012
AS 12 is meant for commercial, profit-earning enterprises, and therefore, cannot be made applicable to NPO without modification. Donations could be in cash or in kind and it should make no difference to an NPO if it is one or the other as far as accounting goes. Cost of donated asset to an NPO is the cost of such asset in the market, except that such asset is funded by a grant or donation and it is imperative to NPO to account for such grant as a grant in kind and the related asset as an asset. If a cash donation of, say, Rs.10 lakhs is given to an NPO for purchase of a building, the donation will be accounted for as donation and building purchased out of the said donation will be accounted for as building. If instead of cash donation, the donor buys a Rs.10 lakhs worth building and gives it free of cost to NPO, it will be accounted for at nominal value, say Re.1, if recommendation of technical guide is to be followed. This apparently is not what is intended.
Further, provisions of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 read with Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 also leave no option to an NPO in Maharashtra and Gujarat, but to account for both donations in cash or in kind at their correct/current value. The provisions of the Act as applicable to Maharashtra/Gujarat, prescribe disclosure of donations in kind, in the accounts. The forms of accounts vide Rule 17(1) specifically provide for separate disclosure of such donations. Contributions payable to the Charity Commissioner, as provided in the BPT, Act, 1950 u/s.58 and Rule 32 of the BPT Rules, 1951 do not exempt donations in kind and consequently, valuation of such assets at Re.1/- may be seen as under valuation for the purpose of avoiding BPT levy. There are, however, exemptions in case of Govt. grants and grants from other NPOs that can be availed to avoid the impact of BPT levy.
In case of project-specific assets purchased out of grants given for execution of a specific project as stated in (iv) above, the value of the asset will be an expenditure for the project during the duration of the project and thereafter, it may become NPO’s asset or a community asset to be handed over to the beneficiaries of grant for future use or it may revert back to the sponsor of the project, as per the condition of the grant. In case the asset becomes community asset for future use of beneficiaries or reverts back to the sponsor, the question of accounting it in NPO’s books does not arise after the expenses are charged off as project expenses. In case the asset becomes part of NPO’s assets on completion of project, it is necessary to ascertain whether the said asset is useful to the NPO in its day-to-day operations and if so, what is its current value to be considered for accounting in the books. If the asset is not useful to the NPO, but the same is valuable, it may be recorded in the books at Re.1 and if on the other hand the asset is useful to the NPO, the same could be recorded on a technical evaluation and brought to books as addition of that year. Impliedly, this also could be considered as a non-monetary grant received free of cost in the year of completion of the project as per recommendation in AS 10, but due to reasons explained earlier, valuation at its current value would be more correct and proper