A funny case law (income tax act)

Others 9129 views 70 replies

This is one of the most hilarious case laws of Income Tax I have Come accross worth sharing.

A lawyer incurs expenditure on his heart surgery and claims it as Business Expenditure u/s 31. His contention being heart is his plant and machinery which enables him to discharge his professional work and therefore the expenses on his treatment be allowed as current repairs.

Obviously the court rejected his claim saying that heart adds to the longevity and efficiency of a human being and professional activity is one of the benefits of it. Also, if heart is a machinery then it should have been included in the assessee's Balance Sheet.

It's really funny how people can come with such crazy ideas to save tax. Let alone if he is a LAWYER. So friends what is your take on it?

 

Replies (70)
Good one..it was given ICAI journal.
that Lawyer is a AAM Admi Party member these days..
Oh...i hope that is just a joke.

No it is not a joke. Attached is the judgment.  The petitioner is a former Law Minister of the Country and a well known legal luminary ..

This case was asked by icai in ca-final direct tax paper in Nov 2012.
shanti bhushan is father of AAP leader prashant bhushan...
This lawyer is truly inspired by KAZRI......... kuchh b krte h yaar btao...........
No wonder; AAP is losing its credibility gradually.

It is good to come across such caselaws that shows imagination of people. Very good attempt to dig deeper into this subject. 

Shanti bhushan father of prashant bhushan
Gud analysis ... he must be a very intelligent person ...

that case  was in ca final paper .

not gradually.........already lost...........they finished with their ego and aam admi's hope

good decision by courts


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register