A funny case law (income tax act)

Agreed with bala...

yes Ankita he very much is.

thanks for the appreciation Kartik.

If susch a claim was allowed then the expenses on food and clothing can also be claimed as exepenses as they are needed for living and surviving and if a person cannot liove he cannot earn. This shows the difference beteween personal exepenses( which are needed irrespective of earning income or not) and business exepenses ! 

If heart is plant and machinery, what would be the cost of acquisition?

No wonder the lawyer didn't give his heart to anyone ..

l @ madhavi - funny analogy...lolz

It is well said that we must corelate concepts with real life situations for better understanding and practicality. I think Lawyer Mr. Shanti Bhushan took it more seriously beyond limits.

.

Though remembering names of opponent and deponent in case laws are a bit difficult for me, i could easily remember in this case and was able to present it right in my exam.

.

I am sure i could remember his name because of the fun part in the case law :)

VERY FUNNY