The Supreme Court has strongly criticised the Income Tax Department for filing Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) on issues that have already been definitively settled by the court. Justices observed that such repetitive and unnecessary litigation clogs the judicial system, burdens taxpayers, and wastes valuable resources. Despite the CBDT increasing monetary limits to reduce litigation, departments continue to file appeals on settled matters, undermining reform efforts.
The Supreme Court of India has reprimanded the Income Tax Department for filing a frivolous Special Leave Petition (SLP) in a matter that had already been conclusively settled by the Court. The Bench criticised the Department for contributing to needless litigation, judicial burden and avoidable har
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Supreme Court reprimanded the Income Tax Department for filing frivolous Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) on matters that had already been conclusively settled by the Court, leading to needless litigation and judicial burden.
The Court expressed serious concern that the Department continues to file SLPs even on issues that have been repeatedly settled, calling the practice 'unnecessary and wasteful' and noting it clogs the judicial system.
The CBDT revised monetary limits in 2024 to Rs 60 lakh for ITAT appeals, Rs 2 crore for High Court appeals, and Rs 5 crore for SLPs before the Supreme Court.
The ruling strengthens the case against repetitive, meritless appeals, potentially allowing taxpayers to seek quicker disposal of similar cases and reducing litigation pressure.
The judgment is expected to push internal reforms in litigation management, potentially leading to stricter scrutiny of SLP filings and the withdrawal of pending SLPs on settled issues.
Nearly 70% of tax cases in higher courts are filed by government authorities.