The Supreme Court has temporarily halted a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand on a real estate project structured under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA). This interim order could significantly impact how developers and landowners are taxed on land transfers in such arrangements. The core of the dispute centres on whether the transfer of development rights within a JDA constitutes a taxable service under GST, or if it's an excluded land transaction.
The Supreme Court has stayed a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand raised on a real estate project executed under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), amove that could have far-reaching implications for developers and landowners across India.
A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and R. Mahadevan passed the interim order earlier this month, staying the operation of an assessment order dated January 27, 2025, issued by the CGST and Central Excise, Nashik-I Division against Arham Infra Develo
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Supreme Court has issued an interim stay on a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand raised on a real estate project executed under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA).
A JDA is a common real estate model where landowners contribute land and developers build a project, with profits or units shared afterwards.
Tax authorities view the transfer of development rights (TDR) in a JDA as a taxable service, while developers argue that land transfers are excluded from GST.
The Bombay High Court had previously declined to stay the GST demand, suggesting developers pursue remedies through statutory appellate authorities first.
Experts argue that taxing development rights indirectly taxes land, which is outside the scope of GST, potentially leading to double taxation.
The stay could set a significant precedent for thousands of similar real estate projects and clarify the taxability of complex land transactions under GST.