The Ministry of Finance has released a corrigendum to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Procedure Rules, 2025. This update, published as G.S.R. 389(E), aims to rectify technical errors and enhance legal clarity within the GSTAT framework. Key changes include clarifications to Rule 115(1), correction of application fee rule references, updates to GSTAT FORM-05, a grammatical fix in Rule 2(b), and an important exception for digitally signed online orders regarding the physical seal.
The Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) has issued a corrigendum to the notification G.S.R. 256(E), originally published on April 24, 2025, to rectify and clarify specific rules under the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) framework. The revised notification-published as G.S.R. 389(E) in the Gazette of India-addresses technical errors and provides greater legal clarity on several provisions.
Key Corrections Made
Clarification in Rule 115(1): The corrigendum updates t
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The corrigendum aims to rectify technical errors and provide greater legal clarity on specific provisions within the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Procedure Rules, 2025.
The rule reference in the schedule of fees for interlocutory applications has been corrected from Rule 118(2) to Rule 119(2).
The citation below the heading in FORM GSTAT-05 has been corrected to read '[See rule 81]' instead of '[See rule 6 and 81]'.
No, orders, judgments, or notices passed online and digitally signed will not be required to bear the physical seal of the Appellate Tribunal.
A grammatical correction was made, replacing the phrase 'section sub-section' with the more accurate term 'sub-section'.