Bollywood actor Aishwarya Rai Bachchan has won a major relief in an income tax dispute after the ITAT, Mumbai ruled in her favour, deleting a tax disallowance of over Rs 4.60 crore made by the assessing officer. The case revolved around the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Act, which deals with expenditure incurred for earning tax-exempt income.
Background of the Case
For the AY 2022-23, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan reported a total income of approximately Rs 39.33 crore. She had made significant investments amounting to around Rs 449 crore in tax-free income-generating assets such as dividend-yielding instruments and tax-exempt securities.
The Assessing Officer (AO) applied Section 14A read with Rule 8D and calculated a disallowance of Rs 4.60 crore (1% of average investment value), alleging that the expenses related to these investments were underreported. However, Aishwarya had already voluntarily disallowed Rs 49.08 lakh as expenses related to exempt income in her tax return.
Why ITAT Ruled in Aishwarya Rai Bachchan's Favour
The ITAT observed several procedural and legal errors in the tax department's approach:
- The AO did not record proper satisfaction before invoking Section 14A, which is a mandatory procedural requirement.
- The disallowance exceeded the total expenditure shown in her profit and loss account (Rs 2.48 crore), making the calculation illogical and unsustainable.
- The computation included investments that did not yield any exempt income, which contradicts settled judicial precedents such as Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT.
The Tribunal therefore upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance to the amount voluntarily declared by the taxpayer, giving Aishwarya Rai full relief.
What is Section 14A and Rule 8D?
- Section 14A prevents taxpayers from claiming deductions on expenses incurred to earn income that is not taxable (such as dividend or tax-free bond interest).
- Rule 8D prescribes the formula to calculate such disallowance. However, before applying Rule 8D, the AO must record satisfaction that the taxpayer's claim is incorrect, a safeguard that ensures fairness and prevents arbitrary taxation.
Significance of the Ruling
The judgment underscores that tax officers cannot apply a disallowance mechanically without examining facts or recording satisfaction. It reinforces the principle that only investments yielding exempt income during the relevant year can be included for Section 14A computation.
What This Means for Taxpayers
This ITAT order serves as an important reminder for high-net-worth individuals, investors and professionals:
- Always make a reasonable voluntary disallowance for expenses linked to exempt income while filing tax returns.
- If the AO fails to record satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D, the disallowance can be legally challenged.
- The case reaffirms the judiciary's stand against blanket tax adjustments and promotes a fair, evidence-based approach to tax assessment.
Expert Insight
Tax experts say the verdict could have wider implications for similar disputes involving the disallowance of expenses on exempt income. It reiterates that procedural compliance under Section 14A is crucial and that arbitrary additions will not withstand judicial scrutiny.
Conclusion
The ITAT's decision in favour of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan not only resolves her Rs 4 crore tax dispute but also strengthens the precedent for fair tax assessments. It highlights the importance of transparency, proper documentation, and adherence to due process in India's income tax regime.
CAclubindia
