Quick Summary
Bollywood actor Aishwarya Rai Bachchan has won a major relief in an income tax dispute after theITAT, Mumbai ruled in her favour, deleting a tax disallowance of over Rs 4.60 crore made by the assessing officer. The case revolved around the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited News Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The assessing officer made a tax disallowance of over Rs 4.60 crore against Aishwarya Rai Bachchan related to expenses incurred for earning tax-exempt income.
The dispute involved Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, read with Rule 8D, which deals with expenditure incurred for earning tax-exempt income.
The ITAT ruled in her favour because the assessing officer failed to record proper satisfaction before invoking Section 14A, the disallowance exceeded her total expenditure, and the calculation included investments that did not yield exempt income.
Section 14A prevents claiming deductions on expenses for non-taxable income, while Rule 8D provides a formula to calculate such disallowances. An assessing officer must record satisfaction before applying Rule 8D.
The ruling highlights that tax officers cannot apply disallowances mechanically and must examine facts and record satisfaction. It reinforces that only investments yielding exempt income in the relevant year can be included for Section 14A computation.
Taxpayers, especially high-net-worth individuals and investors, should make a reasonable voluntary disallowance for expenses linked to exempt income when filing tax returns. If the assessing officer fails to record satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D, the disallowance can be legally challenged.
CAclubindia
