The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Mumbai has overturned a Rs 445 crore tax demand against Netflix India for the 2021-22 assessment year. The tribunal ruled that Netflix India functions solely as a limited-risk distributor, handling marketing and local customer support, rather than a content or technology provider as alleged by the Income Tax Department. This decision dismisses the department's claims that Netflix India should be treated as an entrepreneurial entity responsible for a significant portion of global subscription revenue.
In a significant victory for Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has dismissed a Rs 445-crore tax demand raised by the Income Tax Department for the AY 2021-22. The Tribunal ruled that Netflix India operates merely as a limited-risk distributor
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Income Tax Department had raised a tax demand of Rs 445 crore against Netflix India for the assessment year 2021-22.
The ITAT Mumbai quashed the Rs 445 crore tax demand, ruling in favour of Netflix India.
The tribunal determined that Netflix India operates as a limited-risk distributor, performing only marketing, promotion, and customer support functions, and does not own or develop content or technology.
The department alleged that Netflix India should be treated as an entrepreneurial content and technology service provider, attributing 43% of global subscription revenue to the Indian entity.
No, the ITAT found that Netflix India holds no intangible assets, and all operational risks are indemnified by its associated enterprises.
The decision sets a precedent in transfer pricing, reinforcing that subsidiaries performing routine support functions cannot be deemed profit-generating entrepreneurial entities.