The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Bangalore has ruled in favour of a landowner who declared Rs 1.82 crore from mango sales. The Income Tax Department had previously added Rs 1.20 crore to his income as unexplained cash credit, citing online estimates of yield and prices. However, the tribunal found that the landowner had provided sufficient evidence, including affidavits and proof of payments, to support his declared income. The ITAT emphasised that tax authorities cannot rely solely on internet-based estimations and must verify on-ground facts.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench has granted relief to a landowner who reported Rs 1.82 crore income from mango sales, after the Income Tax Department added Rs 1.20 crore as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
The case involved an assessee from Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, who owned around 22 acres of mango orchards. He filed his income tax return for AY 2020-21, declaring income of about Rs 48 lakh. However, tax officials questioned th
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Income Tax Department added Rs 1.20 crore as unexplained cash credit to a landowner's declared income of Rs 1.82 crore from mango sales, based on online yield and price estimates.
The landowner submitted affidavits from contractors, proof of buyers and payments, and evidence of agricultural activity on his mango orchards.
The tribunal found that the assessing officer relied only on internet-based estimates without verifying on-ground facts like mango variety, quality, or actual yield, and that the assessee had discharged the burden of proof.
The ruling reinforces that farmers must maintain clear documentation, such as buyer invoices and yield details, to substantiate agricultural earnings and prevent tax additions based solely on general online data.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had previously deleted the addition made by the tax department, a decision upheld by the ITAT Bangalore.