The Delhi High Court has instructed income tax officials to move away from a revenue-focused mindset and adopt a more pragmatic, law-abiding approach when dealing with overseas companies seeking nil or lower Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) certificates. The court emphasised that aggressive tax actions contradict India's commitment to improving the ease of doing business and can discourage foreign investment. It highlighted that routinely denying these certificates can have significant negative economic consequences and that the Income Tax Act already provides adequate powers to tax authorities where income is genuinely taxable.
The Delhi High Court has directed income tax officials to abandon a "fetching extra revenue" mindset and instead adopt a pragmatic, justice-oriented approach, warning that aggressive tax actions contradict India's stated objective of improving theease of doing business.
A division bench comprising
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Delhi High Court directed income tax officials to abandon a 'fetching extra revenue' mindset and instead adopt a pragmatic, justice-oriented approach in cases involving overseas companies seeking tax relief.
A pragmatic approach is important because aggressive tax actions contradict India's objective of improving the ease of doing business, discouraging foreign entities and hampering economic growth.
Section 197 Certificates allow recipients of payments like royalties or interest to receive them with reduced or zero tax deduction at source, preventing over-deduction where the actual tax liability is lower or nil.
Routinely rejecting or restricting these certificates has serious economic consequences, hitting the business environment and the idea of providing ease of doing business, ultimately hampering economic growth.
No, the court clarified that denying nil or lower TDS certificates merely as a precautionary or revenue-protective measure is unjustified, as the Income Tax Act already provides sufficient powers to tax authorities where income is chargeable.
The High Court directed the tax department to issue a nil TDS certificate for SFDC Ireland not only for the current assessment year but also for subsequent years, after accepting that the company had no Permanent Establishment in India and payments were not taxable.