Tally
coaching
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Usekiwi Infolabs Private Limited, Delhi ITO WARD - 27(2), New Delhi

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee USEKIWI INFOLABS PVT LTD [ TheAssessee/ Appellant] against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) – 9, , New Delhi [ld CIT(A)] dated 30.09.2019 for the AY 2016-17wherein the appeal of the assessee filed against the order passed u/s 143 (3)of The Income Tax Act (The Act) on 31/5/2019 by the income tax officerWard – 27 (2) New Delhi (The Learned AO) is dismissed. The only issue inthis appeal is the addition u/s 68 of The Income Tax Act of Rs.1,67,50,000/– received by the assessee as share capital and share premium from Messer’s KStart LLC, Mauritius.

Citation :
ITA No. 8339/Del/2019

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI H.S.SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(Through Video Conferencing)

ITA No. 8339/Del/2019
(Assessment Year: 201-17)

Usekiwi Infolabs Private Limited,
Block-B1/D4, Mohan Co-
Operative Estate, Mathura Road,
New Delhi
PAN: AABCU884G
(Appellant) 

Vs. 

ITO,
Ward-27(2),
New Delhi
(Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri Hiren Mehta, CA
Revenue by: Ms. Aman Preet, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 02/11/2020
Date of pronouncement 07/12/2020

O R D E R

PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.

1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee USEKIWI INFOLABS PVT LTD [ TheAssessee/ Appellant] against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) – 9, , New Delhi [ld CIT(A)] dated 30.09.2019 for the AY 2016-17wherein the appeal of the assessee filed against the order passed u/s 143 (3)of The Income Tax Act (The Act) on 31/5/2019 by the income tax officerWard – 27 (2) New Delhi (The Learned AO) is dismissed. The only issue inthis appeal is the addition u/s 68 of The Income Tax Act of Rs.1,67,50,000/– received by the assessee as share capital and share premium from Messer’s KStart LLC, Mauritius.

2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-

“1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the orderpassed by CIT (A)-9, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as CIT (A)), is contrary to the facts and bad in law.

2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the CIT (A) was not justified in sustaining the addition made by the A.O. of Rsof shares by appellant company by holding that the same is unexplained credit u/s 68 of the I T Act on the basis of surmises and conjectures.

2.1 The CIT-A has erred in not considering the submission of appellant which proves the identity, creditworthiness of the  investor and genuineness of the transaction. Documents include audited financial statements of Kstart LLC, Certificate ofIncorporation of Kstart LLC granted by ROC Mauritius, Bank Statement of Kstart LLC, Income Tax return filed with Mauritius Authority, List of directors for the financial year 2015-16.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

Guest
on 10 December 2020
Published in Income Tax
Views : 36
downloaded 6 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags