Triveni Buildcon, Mumbai DCIT CC-7(3), Mumbai

Last updated: 02 January 2021

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -49,Mumbai, passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Citation :
ITA No. 4206/Mum/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“E” BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER &
SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 4206/Mum/2019
(Assessment Years: 2013-14)

Triveni Buildcon
Plot No. 50,63,64,65,
Silverstar, Sector – 18,
Kamothe Panvel, Raigad,
Mumbai – 410210.
PAN/GIR No. : AAFFT2360R
Appellant)

Vs.

DCIT, CC-7(3)
Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai.
Respondent

Appellant by : Ms. Aparna, AR
Respondent by : Shri T.S. Khalsa, DR

Date of Hearing 30/12/2020
Date of Pronouncement 30/12/2020

O R D E R

PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE - JM:

The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -49,Mumbai, passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2. At the time hearing, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is intended to settle thetax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.

3. We heard the rival contentions and perused thematerial on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and has filed an application as envisaged by the Ld.AR. We are of theview that, no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn and the assessee is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order in accordance with the provisions of law.

To know more in details find the attachement file

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok