Smt. Dharna Goyal @ Dharna Garg Vs Aryan Infratech Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)


Last updated: 05 December 2020

Court :
High Court Delhi

Brief :
Present petition has been filed by the Petitioner for quashing the summoning order dated 28.11.2016 and the complaint bearing CC No. 6573/2017 filed by the Respondent against the Petitioner under Sections 138/141/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘NIA’) as well as all further proceedings emanating therefrom including the order dated 04.12.2019 passed by the Special Judge NDPS in Criminal Revision bearing CR No. 114/2019 titled as Dharna Goyal v.M/s Aryan Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

Citation :
CRL.M.C. 708/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2910/2020 & 2912/2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 16.10.2020

CRL.M.C. 708/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2910/2020 & 2912/2020
SMT. DHARNA GOYAL @ DHARNA GARG ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Sahiba Singh, Advocate

versus

M/S. ARYAN INFRATECH PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through:

CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1. Present petition has been filed by the Petitioner for quashing the summoning order dated 28.11.2016 and the complaint bearing CC No. 6573/2017 filed by the Respondent against the Petitioner under Sections 138/141/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘NIA’) as well as all further proceedings emanating therefrom including the order dated 04.12.2019 passed by the Special Judge NDPS in Criminal Revision bearing CR No. 114/2019 titled as Dharna Goyal v.M/s Aryan Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

2. Brief facts shorn of unnecessary details are that a complaint was filed by the Respondent against M/s Ringing Bells Pvt. Ltd., Accused No. 1 and five other Accused persons including the Petitioner herein under Sections 138/141/142 of the NIA. It was alleged in the complaint that in discharge of legal liability, Accused No. 1 issued a cheque bearing No. 731759 dated 28.10.2016 for an amount of Rs. 2 crores, duly signed by Accused No.2, with the consent and knowledge of the other Co-accused including the Petitioner and that the same was dishonoured on presentation. A legal notice of demand dated 02.11.2016 was sent on 04.11.2016 by the complainant but despite the receipt of the notice the Accused persons failed to remit the alleged outstanding amount. On the filing of the complaint, the Trial Court summoned the Accused including the Petitioner. The Petitioner herein has been arrayed as Accused No.5 in the capacity of CEO of Accused No.1 Company.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

Guest
Published in LAW
Views : 247
downloaded 264 times

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details