Rejection of deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) / 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act,1961

Last updated: 18 June 2021
Quick Summary
This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case involves The Puttur Primary Co-op Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. challenging the rejection of deductions claimed under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the deductions, citing the bank's dealings with nominal members and its interest income from fixed deposits. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions by co-ordinate benches and higher courts to guide the resolution of these issues.

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.03.2019 passed by Ld CIT(A), Mangaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2016-17. The grounds urged by the assessee give rise to the following two issues:-

Citation :
ITA No.1449/Bang/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  2. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  3. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  4. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  5. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  6. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  7. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  8. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  9. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  10. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member S D KannanS D KannanPro Member rana andcompanyrana andcompanyPro Member sachinguravsachinguravPro Member Sanjay SharmaSanjay SharmaPro Member CA Prashant RastogiCA Prashant Rastogi
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category