banner_ad

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c)


Last updated: 08 October 2007

Court :
HC

Brief :
Held by the Hon`ble Court that, neither the assessee nor the Department proves anything about the loans therefore concealment was not proved and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not justified in law.

Citation :
C.I.T. Vs. T.M. Abdul Azeez and Co.

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) C.I.T. Vs. T.M. Abdul Azeez and Co. 07/05/2007 [2007] 293 ITR 384 (Mad) Case Fact: Whether, where assessee himself has disclosed the additional amounts and also fails to prove the genuineness of the loan, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is justified in law? Decision: Held by the Hon`ble Court that, neither the assessee nor the Department proves anything about the loans therefore concealment was not proved and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not justified in law.
 

CCI Pro

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details