Partap Singh, Palwal ITO WARD - 11(1), Faridabad


Quick Summary
This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case concerns an appeal filed by Partap Singh against an order from the CIT (Appeals), Faridabad, for the assessment year 2010-11. During the hearing, the assessee's representative submitted that Partap Singh had opted for settlement under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, having filed the necessary forms. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals), Faridabad, dated 18.02.2019 for the Assessment Year 2010-111.

Citation :
ITA No. 4794/Del/2019

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “SMC-1”: NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHR BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(Through Video Conferencing)

ITA No. 4794/Del/2019
 (Assessment Year: 2010-11)

Partap Singh,
H. No. DA–738, Kalyan Enclave,
Palwal, Haryana – 121 102.
PAN: AQIPS3069B
(Appellant) 

Vs.

ITO,
Ward-II (1),
Faridabad.
(Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri Kapil Agarwal, C.A.;
Department by : Shri Rajesh Kumar, Sr. DR;
Date of Hearing 03/02/2021
Date of pronouncement 03/02/2021

O R D E R

PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.

1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals), Faridabad, dated 18.02.2019 for the Assessment Year 2010-111.

2. When the matter is called up for hearing the ld. AR of the assesseesubmitted a letter dated 28.01.2021 wherein it is submitted that assessee has already opted for settlement of the dispute involved in this appeal under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 by filing Form Nos. 1 and 2. Subsequently, Form No. 3 as per section 5(1) of the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 was also issued to the assessee.

3. In view of the above facts the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 03/02/2021.

 Sd/-                                               Sd/-
(BHAVNESH SAINI)                      (PRASHANT MAHARISHI)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

 Dated : 03/02/2021.
*MEHTA* 

Copy forwarded to
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT (A)
5. DR: ITAT

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
 ITAT, New Delhi

 

Date of dictation : 3.02.2021
Date on which the typed draft is placed before the dictating member : 3.02.2021
Date on which the typed draft is placed before the other member : 3.02.2021
Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS : 3.02.2021
Date on which the fair order is placed before the dictating member for pronouncement : 3.02.2021
Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr. PS/PS : 3.02.2021
Date on which the final order is uploaded on the website of ITAT : 3.02.2021
date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk : 3.02.2021
Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk
The date on which the file goes to the Assistant
Registrar for signature on the order
Date of dispatch of the order 
 

FAQ :

The case involved an appeal filed by Partap Singh against an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in Faridabad for the assessment year 2010-11.

The appeal was filed by the assessee, Partap Singh, against a decision made by the CIT (Appeals) concerning his tax assessment for the year 2010-11.

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the assessee had opted for settlement under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

The Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, is a government initiative that allows taxpayers to settle disputes related to direct taxes.

This judgement relates to the assessment year 2010-11.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 122

Comments




CCI Pro