Notice of Personal Hearing devoid of any details is invalid

Last updated: 19 January 2024
Quick Summary
The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that a notice for a personal hearing is invalid if it lacks essential details such as the date, time, and venue. In the case of Tata Steel Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh, the court found that the Revenue Department had issued a notice with blank fields for these crucial elements. Consequently, the court directed the Revenue Department to provide Tata Steel Ltd. with a proper opportunity for a personal hearing, in line with Section 75(4) of the CGST Act.

Court :
Chhattisgarh High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh [WPT No. 167 of 2023 dated November 7, 2023] disposed the writ petition and directed the Revenue Department to grant opportunity of personal hearing to the Assessee in compliance with Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") as notice of personal hearing was devoid of details pertaining to date, time and venue.

Citation :
WPT No. 167 of 2023 dated November 7, 2023

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 106
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork
  2. CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation
  3. CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence
  4. CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents
  5. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  6. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation
  7. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  8. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  9. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  10. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member AnoopAnoopPro Member VIJAY M DHANAKVIJAY M DHANAKPro Member Krishna Kumar AKrishna Kumar APro Member Ankit MehtaAnkit MehtaPro Member Sharang Sanjay MangalekarSharang Sanjay Mangalekar
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category