Court :
ITAT New Delhi
Brief :
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-15, New Delhi dated 01.03.2017 pertaining to A.Y.2010-11.
Citation :
ITA No.4303/Del/2017
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
BEFORE SH. N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
ITA No.4303/Del/2017
Assessment Year: 2010-11
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Plot
No.1, Nelson Mandela Road,
Vasant Kunj, New Delhi
PAN No.
(APPELLANT)
Vs
DCIT
Circle – 9 (1) New Delhi
(RESPONDENT)
Appellant by Sh. Rohit Jain, Advocate
M/s. Somiya Jain, CA
Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR.
Date of hearing: 05/01/2021
Date of Pronouncement: 05/01/2021
ORDER
PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-15, New Delhi dated 01.03.2017 pertaining to A.Y.2010-11.
2. At the very outset the counsel for the assessee drew ourattention to the letter dated 04.01.2020 in which he stated that the appellant in order to buy peace and avoid litigation decided to settle the captioned appeal under the direct tax Vivaad SeVishwas Act, 2020. The counsel pointed out that necessary declarations have already been filed with the designated authority.
To know more in details find the attachment file
CAclubindia
