In the matter of CA V.Venkata Sivakumar Vs. IBBI & Ors., W.P.No.13229 of 2020


Last updated: 13 November 2020

Court :
IBBI

Brief :
In this writ petition, the Petitioner challenges the constitutional validity of Regulation 7A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 (the IP Regulations) read with Bye-Law 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) (Model Bye-Laws and Governing Board of Insolvency Professional Agencies) Regulations, 2016 (Model Bye-Laws IPA Regulations).

Citation :
W.P.No.13229 of 2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Corporate Law
Views : 968
downloaded 281 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. Supreme Court affirms the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act: No ITC to the recipient unless the supplier actually deposits tax to the Government
  2. No Addition under Income Tax Law on Bogus Purchases, Where Sales Are Accepted and Supplies Are Backed by GST Records and Banking Trail
  3. Voluntary Tax Payment Does Not Bar Proceedings Under Section 74 Where Suppression Allegation Remains Uncontested
  4. Appellate Authority Cannot Pass "Copy-Paste" Orders Without Independent Application of Mind
  5. Audit Closure Bars Reopening of Same Issues Under Section 73
  6. Big Relief ITC Cannot Be Denied to a Bona Fide Purchaser Merely Because the Supplier's Registration Cancelled Retrospectively
  7. ITC Cannot Be Denied Solely on the Ground that the Supplier was Subsequently Declared Non-Existent, Without Examining the Documentary Evidence Furnished by the Assessee
  8. GSTAT to Examine Whether Mandatory Pre-Deposit is Payable on Penalty Order Only Passed Prior to October 1, 2025
  9. No Further Pre-Deposit is Required Before the Appellate Tribunal Where the Amount Already Deposited Before the First Appellate Authority Exceeds the Specified Limit of Pre-Deposit Payable on the Reduced Demand
  10. Corporate Guarantee Without Consideration Not Taxable Under GST

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Sasidhar BSasidhar BPro Member Subbiah SSubbiah SPro Member Vignesh KillurVignesh KillurPro Member R B PetheR B PethePro Member AbhayAbhay
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Follow us
add to google news

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 July 2026
Article Assistants

R Shyam and Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Chartered Accountant (Indirect Taxation)

Gowra Ventures Pvt Ltd

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
11 July 2026
CA semi qualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT, CA SemiQualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
CA Inter

Vikram Jadhav and Company

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Semi qualified CA

Garg Bros & Associate CA

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details