Direct supplies by vendor to customer not to be included in assessable value of the assessee

Last updated: 19 July 2023
Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has ruled that the value of goods directly delivered to a customer's site, which never entered the assessee's factory, should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty. The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, agreeing with the lower tribunal that since the assessee did not manufacture these 'bought-out' items and they did not pass through their premises, no excise duty was leviable on them by the assessee.

Court :
Supreme Court of India

Brief :
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise Pune II v. SS Engineers [Civil Appeal No. 5700 of 2019 dated July 07, 2023] dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and held that, value of items which were directly delivered to customer's place and which never entered in the factory of the assessee should not be added to assessable value of goods supplied by the assessee.

Citation :
Civil Appeal No. 5700 of 2019 dated July 07, 2023

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 222
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  3. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  4. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  5. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  6. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  7. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  8. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  9. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  10. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member DHANASHRI KARMARKAR DHANASHRI KARMARKAR Pro Member KayOne ConsultingKayOne ConsultingPro Member AGNIHOTRAM RAM NARAYANAAGNIHOTRAM RAM NARAYANAPro Member NISHANT SIPANINISHANT SIPANIPro Member Amar HiroAmar Hiro
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category