banner_ad

Deleting the disallowance made by AO u/s 14A read with Rule 8D


Last updated: 14 August 2021

Court :
ITAT Chennai

Brief :
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order of the learned CIT(A)-18, Chennai dated 18.09.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.

Citation :
I.T.A.No.3069/Chny/2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI

BEFORE SHRI V.DURGA RAO , JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND SHRI G.MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

I.T.A.No.3069/Chny/2017

Assessment Year : 2011-12

The Deputy Commissioner of Income
Tax,
Central Circle-1(1)
Chennai.

Appellant

vs

M/s. TCP Ltd.
10, TCP SapthagiriBhavan
Karpagambal Nagar,
Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

PAN: AAACT 3615K

Respondent

Appellant by : Ms. R.Anita, JCIT

Respondent by : Mrs. S.Vidya, C.A

Date of hearing : 22.07.2021

Date of Pronouncement : 28.07.2021

O R D E R

This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order of the learned CIT(A)-18, Chennai dated 18.09.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is in the business of manufacturing and trading of chemicals and generation of power has filed its return of income for assessment year 2011-12 on 30.09.2011.

3.Being aggrieved by assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the learned CIT(A). Before the
learned CIT(A), the assessee has challenged disallowances u/s.14A of the Act on the ground that the Assessing Officer has erred in disallowing of interest expenditure, even though the assessee has filed necessary evidence to prove that it has not used interest bearing funds for making investments in shares and securities which yield exempt income.

4. The first issue that came up for our consideration from ground no.2 of revenue appeal is disallowance of expenditure in relation to exempt income u/s.14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The facts with regard to impugned dispute are that the assessee has earned dividend income of Rs.6,99,349/-, which was claimed exempt u/s.10(34) of the Act. The assessee had also disallowed a sum of Rs.60,073/- as expenditure incurred towards earning exempt income.

5.In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th July, 2021.

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

 

CCI Pro

Poojitha Raam Vinay pro badge
Published in Income Tax
Views : 84
downloaded 219 times

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
22 May 2026
Audit assistant

Displayandbeyond

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Sr. Financial Analyst - Consolidation

Search Synergy

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Senior Accountant cum purchase Manager

Vardhaman Group of India

Pimpri Chinchwad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Audit executive

vdsr & co LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Article Assistant

Geeta Manchanda & CO.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Article, CA & Paid Assistant Positions

Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details