DCIT, New Delhi M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad


Last updated: 28 December 2020

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
Since common question of facts and law is involved in allthe aforesaid cross appeals, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of composite order to avoid repetition of discussion.

Citation :
ITA No.3125/Del./2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH ‘I-2’ : NEW DELHI)
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
BEFORE
SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
and
SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 5774/Del./2014
A. Y. : 2009-10

M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. 
(Formerly known as Michelin 
India Tyres P. Ltd.)
3rd Floor, Orchid Business Park, 
Gurgaon

Vs. 

DCIT Circle-6(1) New Delhi

Stay No. 288/Del/2020
(ITA No. 5774/Del./2014)
A. Y. : 2009-10

M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. 
(Formerly known as Michelin 
India Tyres P. Ltd.)
3rd Floor, Orchid Business Park, 
Gurgaon

Vs. 

DCIT Circle-6(1) New Delhi

ITA No.6128/Del./2014
A.Y. : 2009-10

DCIT Circle-6(1) New Delhi 

Vs. 

M/s. Michelin India Tyres P. Ltd.
DLF Towers, Jasola District Center,
New Delhi-110025

ITA No.3167/Del./2017
A.Y. : 2010-11

M/s. Michelin India P. Ltd. 
Orchid Business Park, 
Sector-48, Sohana Road Gurgaon 

Vs. 

ACIT Range-6 New Delhi

ITA No.3125/Del./2017
A.Y. : 2010-11

DCIT Circle-16(2) New Delhi
PAN : AADCM8454G
(APPELLANT)

Vs.

Michelin India P. Ltd.
7th Floor, The Pinnacle
Business Tower,
Faridabad 
(RESPONDENT)

ASSESSEE BY : Shri Nageshwar Rao, Adv.
REVENUE BY : Shri Ajit Kr. Singh, CIT-DR
Date of Hearing : 08.12.2020
Date of Order : 24 .12.2020

O R D E R

PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Since common question of facts and law is involved in allthe aforesaid cross appeals, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of composite order to avoid repetition of discussion.

2. Appellant, M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘taxpayer’) and Appellant, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1) (herein after referred to as ‘revenue’) by filing the present cross appeals sought to set aside the impugned order dated 04.08.2014 and 07.11.2016 for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively passed by Ld. CIT(A) challenging the order passed by AO in consonance with the orders passed by the ld. TPO under section 143 (3) read with section 144C of the Incometax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) on the grounds inter alia that :-

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

CCI Pro

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 103
downloaded 211 times

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details