Avail 20% discount on updated CA lectures for Dec 21 .Use Code RESULT20 !! Call : 088803-20003

ICICI

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

DCIT, New Delhi M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
Since common question of facts and law is involved in allthe aforesaid cross appeals, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of composite order to avoid repetition of discussion.

Citation :
ITA No.3125/Del./2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH ‘I-2’ : NEW DELHI)
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
BEFORE
SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
and
SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 5774/Del./2014
A. Y. : 2009-10

M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. 
(Formerly known as Michelin 
India Tyres P. Ltd.)
3rd Floor, Orchid Business Park, 
Gurgaon

Vs. 

DCIT Circle-6(1) New Delhi

Stay No. 288/Del/2020
(ITA No. 5774/Del./2014)
A. Y. : 2009-10

M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. 
(Formerly known as Michelin 
India Tyres P. Ltd.)
3rd Floor, Orchid Business Park, 
Gurgaon

Vs. 

DCIT Circle-6(1) New Delhi

ITA No.6128/Del./2014
A.Y. : 2009-10

DCIT Circle-6(1) New Delhi 

Vs. 

M/s. Michelin India Tyres P. Ltd.
DLF Towers, Jasola District Center,
New Delhi-110025

ITA No.3167/Del./2017
A.Y. : 2010-11

M/s. Michelin India P. Ltd. 
Orchid Business Park, 
Sector-48, Sohana Road Gurgaon 

Vs. 

ACIT Range-6 New Delhi

ITA No.3125/Del./2017
A.Y. : 2010-11

DCIT Circle-16(2) New Delhi
PAN : AADCM8454G
(APPELLANT)

Vs.

Michelin India P. Ltd.
7th Floor, The Pinnacle
Business Tower,
Faridabad 
(RESPONDENT)

ASSESSEE BY : Shri Nageshwar Rao, Adv.
REVENUE BY : Shri Ajit Kr. Singh, CIT-DR
Date of Hearing : 08.12.2020
Date of Order : 24 .12.2020

O R D E R

PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Since common question of facts and law is involved in allthe aforesaid cross appeals, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of composite order to avoid repetition of discussion.

2. Appellant, M/s. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘taxpayer’) and Appellant, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1) (herein after referred to as ‘revenue’) by filing the present cross appeals sought to set aside the impugned order dated 04.08.2014 and 07.11.2016 for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively passed by Ld. CIT(A) challenging the order passed by AO in consonance with the orders passed by the ld. TPO under section 143 (3) read with section 144C of the Incometax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) on the grounds inter alia that :-

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

Guest
on 28 December 2020
Published in Income Tax
Views : 16
downloaded 8 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags