Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Appellant was an advertising agency, engaged in creating original concepts and designing advertising material filed its returns both under Finance Act, 1994 and Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Assessing Authority completed assessment by excludin

There is a conflict of opinions between the judgments of the Division Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Dilip N. Shroff (supra) on one hand and on the other in the case of Shriram Mutual Fund (supra). Secondly, the object behind enactment of

Assessee/appellant was a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Oord ACZ Marine Contractors BV, Netherlands [VOAMC]. It executed a dredging contract at Port Mundra for Adani Gujarat Port Ltd. in the relevant previous year and since it followed completed cont

Dishonour of cheque - Default in payment of fine - sentence of imprisonment not permissible - Act does not provide for sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of fine.

Central Excise – High Court not to interfere at Show cause Notice stage : Madras High Court

Where a deposit stands in the name of a third person and where that person is related to the assessee, in such a case the proper course would be to call upon the person in whose books the deposit appears or the person in whose name the deposit stands

Held by the Hon`ble Court that, by virtue of its right by way of a lease form month to month or for a period not more than one year assessee is not owner of the house property as per section 27(iiib). Therefore income is assessable as business income

Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the instant case and, in particular, having regard to the fact that the Commissioner exercising its revisional jurisdiction reopened the order of assessment only in relation to lease equalizat