Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) observed from a newspaper article that unpublished financial results of some major companies were posted on private WhatsApp group prior to their announcement by the companies

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) started investigation into the affairs of Sai Prakash Properties Development Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘SPPDL/ Company’). During the course of investigation, the Inv

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) started investigation into the affairs of Sai Prakash Properties Development Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘SPPDL/ Company’). During the course of investigation, the Inv

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) started investigation into the affairs of Sai Prakash Properties Development Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘SPPDL/ Company’). During the course of investigation, the Inv

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) started investigation into the affairs of Sai Prakash Properties Development Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘SPPDL/ Company’). During the course of investigation, the Inv

Vide Interim Order dated December 10, 2014, Whole Time Member of Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) observed that Wisdom Agro Tech India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘WATIL’/’Company’) was prima facie engag

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) initiated investigation in the scrip of Maa Jagdambe Tradelinks Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “company/ MJTL”) regarding allegations of generation of bogus Long Term Ca

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Sun Dye Chem v. The Assistant Commissioner [W.P. No. 29676 of 2019 dated November 6, 2020] has held that absence of enabling provision cannot jeopardize taxpayer from availing credit that they are en

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Maansarovar Motors Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner and Others[W.P. No. 4468 of 2020, dated 29 September, 2020]has set aside orders for levying interest on input tax credit (“ITC”) as app

These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the two different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment years are 2014-2015 and 2015-2016.