Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Revenue has filed the captioned appeals against the orders dt. 02/01/2018, 22/03/2019 and 28/11/2018 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) (for short “the CIT(A)”), Patiala pertaining to the A.Y. 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 respe

This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order dt. 18/11/2019 of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh.

Aggrieved by the non-inclusion of principles of natural justice in theMaster Directions on Fraud (‘the Master Circular’, for short), dated01.07.2016, issued under Section 35-A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 by the Reserve Bank of India, aggrieve

By this Stay Petition, the assessee is seeking to stay the recovery of outstanding tax arrears of Rs.1260,56,49,209.

At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee, by placing a letter dated 03rd December, 2020, requested for permission to withdraw the Stay Petitions filed by the assessee. The learned DR did not raise any objection for the s

These appeals have been filed by the Revenue under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”)challenging the common order dated 07.07.2014 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai (for brevity

These appeals have been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) challenging the common order dated 07.07.2014 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai (for brevit

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan pronounced the Reportable judgment of the Bench comprising His Lordship, Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.Subhash Reddy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah.

The appellant M/s. ACME Warehousing Private Ltd. has filed thisintra court writ appeal, only aggrieved by the observation of the learnedSinge Judge in paragraph 2 of the order dated 25.08.2020 made in W.P.No.8086 of 2020.

(Judgment of the court was made by Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J.)The present Appeals are squarely covered by the decision of this Courtin PVR Ltd. v. CTO (W.A.No.685, 694 to to 697 decided on 15.10.20020) which dealt with the question of taxability of the En