Judgements by Guest

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 23.04.2021which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had fil

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an application dated 20.04.2021 on behalf of the assessee has been placed on record wherein the assessee has submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw this appeal since assessee had filed Form 1 a

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Fo

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Fo

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2012-13 arises from the CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad’s order dated 12-11-2018 passed in case No.10018/2018-19/A3/CIT(A)-6, in proceedings u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both the parties. Case fil

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2009-10 arises from the CIT(A)-12, Hyderabad’s order dated 17-07-2019 passed in case No.10289/2018-19, in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both the parties. Case file peruse

The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26.12.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 10, Ahmedabad arising out of the order dated 05.12.2016 passed by the ITO, Ward-2(2)(1), Ahmedabad under Sect

The captioned four appeals arise from the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) against different assessment years.

The captioned five appeals arise from the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) against different assessment years.

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Aurangabad on 13-04-2017 deleting penalty of Rs.2,26,23,440 imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called