Judgements by Guest

This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 05.12.2019. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-

Present two appeals are directed at the instance of the assessee against common order of the ld.CIT(A)-4, Baroda dated 17.12.2015 passed for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05.

The above three appeals are directed at the instance of the Revenue against the orders of the ld.CIT(A)-9, Ahmedabad of even dated i.e. 12.12.2018 for the above three assessment years. All these three appeals are disposed of by this common order for

The instant writ petition is directed against the assessment order dated 22.04.2021, passed by respondent no. 1, under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). The impugned assessment order concerns the

The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute for the year under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 and therefore, seek withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld. DR did not object to the same.

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2006-07 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, Mumbai [in short CIT(A) ] dated 21/08/2019 which has deleted penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Rs.103.18 Lacs as levied by

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2013-14 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Mumbai [in short CIT(A)] which has held that the assessee was entitled for depreciation of 60% on mobiles, tablets

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2009-10 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Mumbai [in short CIT(A) ] dated 17/07/2019 which has provided certain relief to the assessee on account of alleged

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year [AY] 2012-13 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-44, Mumbai [CIT(A)] dated 05/08/2019 which has deleted the penalty of Rs.14,302/- u/s 271(1)(c) as levied by Ld. AO vide penalt

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2009-10 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-22, Mumbai [in short CIT(A) ] which has provided certain relief to the assessee on account of alleged bogus purchases.