Judgements by Guest

This appeal by the revenue is against the order dated 29.8.2019 of CIT(Appeals)-1, Bengaluru relating to AY 2016-17. The grounds of appeal raised by the revenue reads as follows:-

Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate orders passed by Ld. CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and they relate to the assessment years 2015-16 & 2016-17 In both the appeals, the assessee is challenging the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in con

UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES BY ADJUDICATING OFFICER) RULES, 1995

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(Exemptions), Bangalore [CIT(E)] dated 20.09.2019 passed u/s. 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act].

The appellant had filed an application dated July 22, 2020 (received by the respondent on July 28, 2020), under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”). The respondent, by a letter dated August 06,2020, responded to the application filed by t

The appellant had filed an application dated August 30, 2020 (received by the respondent through RTI MIS Portal), under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”). The respondent, by a letter dated September 04, 2020, responded to the applicati

The appellant had filed an application dated June 27, 2020 (received by SEBI on July 09, 2020), under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”). The respondent, by a letter dated July 30, 2020, responded to the application filed by the appella

UNDER SECTIONS 11, 11(4) AND 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH SECTIONS 56, 60 AND 73 OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956

1. The appellant had filed an application dated June 22, 2020 (received by SEBI on June 30, 2020) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”). The respondent, by a letter dated July 24, 2020 responded to the application filed by the appellan

Securities and ExchangeBoard of India (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI”) received several complaints against Hahnemann Food Products Limited (hereinafter referred to as “HFPL”or “the Company”).