Income Tax Judgements

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year [AY] 2012-13 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-44, Mumbai [CIT(A)] dated 05/08/2019 which has deleted the penalty of Rs.14,302/- u/s 271(1)(c) as levied by Ld. AO vide penalt

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2009-10 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-22, Mumbai [in short CIT(A) ] which has provided certain relief to the assessee on account of alleged bogus purchases.

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2011-12 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, Mumbai [in short CIT(A) ] dated 26/08/2019 which has provided certain relief to the assessee on account of alleged

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year [AY] 2007-08 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai [CIT(A)] dated 30/08/2019 which has deleted the penalty of Rs.11 Lacs u/s 271(1)(c) as levied by Ld. AO vide penalty

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment year [AY in short] 2011-12 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai [in short CIT(A) ] which has provided certain relief to the assessee on account of alleged bogus purchases.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 29.11.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2015-14.

These two appeals by the assessee arise out of the separate orders dated 23-07-2019 passed by the CIT(A)-1, Nashik in relation to the assessment years 2011-12 and 2014-15.

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 05-12-2016 passed by the CIT(A)-2, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2012-13.

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 31-08-2015 passed by the CIT(A)-13, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2010-11.

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 22-12-2016 passed by the CIT(A)-5, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2013-14.