Income Tax Judgements

By way of this appeal, the assessee challenges the validity ofrevisional jurisdiction u/s 263 as exercised by learned Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-33, Mumbai [in short referred to as ‘Pr.CIT’], for Assessment Year [in short referred to as ‘AY’] 201

The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] and arise out of the assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 the Income Tax Act 1961, (the ‘Act’)

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Pr.CIT(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur dated 22/03/2019 passed U/s 12AA(3) and 12AA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act). Following grounds have been taken by th

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] dated 29.7.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated 30.01.2017 and pertains to the assessment year (A.Y.) 2009-10.

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] dated 10.3.2015 pertaining assessment year 2007-08 wherein learned CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal without any discussion on

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated26.03.2018 and pertains to the assessment year (A.Y.) 2012-13.

The assessee has filed these four appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 52, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

These are appeals by the assessee, against the common orderdated 31st July 2018, passed by the learned CIT(A) for the concerned assessment years as above.

This appeal by the assessee wherein the assessee is aggrieved that the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated01.11.2018 has erred in sustaining 25% disallowance on account of bogus purchase for the assessm