Income Tax Judgements

This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-36, New Delhi, Dated 26.07.2019, for the A.Y. 2007-2008.

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Amrish Rameshchandra Shah v. the Union of India &ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 2103 o 2021, dated January 27, 2021] stayed the show cause-cum-demand notice issued to a Chartered Accountant in a Writ Petition challenging

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against order dated 10/02/2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-39, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2009-10 raising following grounds:

The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 07.09.2017 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXV, New Delhi forthe quantum of assessment passed u/s. 143(3) for theAssessment Year 2013-14. In the grou

This appeal is filed by the assessee against order dated 01/09/2017 passed by CIT(A)-40, Delhi for assessment year 2014-15.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2003-04 contests the order of learned first appellate authority passed on 31/12/2010 on certain grounds of appeal. The assessment was framed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) 13/03/2006.

This appeal in ITA No.753/Mum/2014 for A.Y.2008-09 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, in appeal No.CIT(A)-38/IT-170/2011-12 dated 29/11/2013 (ld. CIT(A) in short) in the matter of imposition of penalty u/s.271

This appeal in ITA No.5654/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2012-13 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-29/IT-196/ITO-18(2)(4)/15-16 dated 28/04/2015 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assess

These appeals in ITA No.7105/Mum/2017, 7106/Mum/2017, 7107/Mum/2017 & 7108/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2009-10, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai in appeal Nos.CIT(A)-50/IT-73/2016-17-AY

These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought