Others Judgements

The Assessee, an Indian Company, was a subsidiary of May and Baker Ltd., a U.K. Company which had an industrial undertaking in India. Under a Scheme of Amalgamation, the said industrial undertaking of the U..K. Company was hived off to the Assessee C

The assessee is a trust registered u/s 12A of the IT Act, 1961, engaged in providing medical facility/aid. CIT noted that the assessee trust was carrying on Medical Profession, in the form of a Multi-speciality Hospital, on commercial basis wherein f

The respondent AO re-opened the assessment by notice u/s 147 after sending a notice of scrutiny and questionnaire. The petitioner responded to notice requesting reasons for reopening the assessment be furnished. The Revenue acceded to the petitioner’

The assessee had made a fixed deposit of Rs 1,00,00,000 with ICICI Bank and earned interest of Rs 11,77,574 on these deposits. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs4,36,705 on account of interest paid on loan of Rs 75,00,000 taken, on the securityof

The assessee engaged in the business of share trading and regular purchase and sale of shares filed a Writ Petition challenging notice issued u/s 148 to reopen assessment. The department that the Writ Petition is not maintainable to challenge the not

The Respondent-assessee is a bank. In the given case, the Bombay High Court has to decide whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the investment in tax free securities/investments are represented by assessee's own funds in the shape of share

The petitioner alleged that a team of Enforcement Officers visited the establishment of the respondent and found that the respondent-establishment failed to extend Provident Fund benefits to transport contractors’ workers; failed to pay Provident Fun

The Respondent assessee is a company incorporated in Belgium and a tax resident of Belgium engaged in business of operation of ships in international traffic. The Assessee collected Inland HaulageCharges from it’s customers in respect of transportati

Commissioner of Income Tax – Versus – HDFC Bank Ltd.

The issue raised before the Bombay High Court was that whether a resolution for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation can be passed under Section 110 of the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI Circular dated May 21, 2013, by a majority of the equity sharehol