banner_ad

Assessee allowed to take reimbursement of additional GST liability on contract/work order awarded in pre-GST regime


Last updated: 26 December 2022

Court :
Chhattisgarh High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s GordhandasGobindram v. State of Chhattisgarh [WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022] allowed the petition filed by the assessee to seek reimbursement of the additional tax liability on implementation of the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before the GST regime. 

Citation :
WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022

The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s Gordhandas Gobindram v. State of Chhattisgarh [WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022] allowed the petition filed by the assessee to seek reimbursement of the additional tax liability on implementation of the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before the GST regime. 

Facts

This petition has been filed by M/s GordhandasGobindram ("the Petitioner"), who was awarded a contract/work order by the Public Works Department, Raipur ("the Respondent") prior to the introduction of GST law. The Petitioner on account of the introduction of new GST law was required to pay certain additional tax liability, which the Petitioner now intends to get it refunded from the Respondent. 

The Petitioner submitted that the Respondent itself has taken a policy decision vide order dated October 10, 2018 ("Impugned Order") passed by the State Government to ensure the reimbursement of additional tax liability incurred by the contractors in respect of contracts, which were awarded prior to July 1, 2017 i.e. the date from which the GST law came into force.

Issue

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to seek reimbursement of additional GST liability imposed after the introduction of GST law?

Held

The Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court in WPC No. 5471 of 2022 held as under:

  • Relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s D.A. Enterprises v.State of Chhattisgarh [WPT No.94 of 2020 on November 17, 2022], wherein under identical set of facts the Court allowed the petition.
  • Permitted the Petitioner to approach the Respondent in terms of the Impugned Order. 
  • Directed the Petitioner to file a fresh claim and produce necessary proof of the additional tax liability incurred on account of the introduction of the GST law within a period of one week.
  • Further directed the Respondent, to scrutinize Petitioner’s fresh claim and take a decision within a further period of 90 days.
     
 

CCI Pro

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 271

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
23 May 2026
Article Assistant

Geeta Manchanda & CO.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 May 2026
CA Article /Trainee

Malik Sunil & co

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 May 2026
CA ARTICLE

PRAVEEN GARG & CO

Faridabad

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 May 2026
Audit Assistant / Article Trainee / Intern

SSGS and Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 May 2026
Accounts & Tax Executive

PARAS KHURANA AND CO

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
11 May 2026
Post office

Post office

Anakapalle

Others

View Details