Assessee allowed to take reimbursement of additional GST liability on contract/work order awarded in pre-GST regime


Last updated: 26 December 2022

Court :
Chhattisgarh High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s GordhandasGobindram v. State of Chhattisgarh [WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022] allowed the petition filed by the assessee to seek reimbursement of the additional tax liability on implementation of the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before the GST regime. 

Citation :
WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022

The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s Gordhandas Gobindram v. State of Chhattisgarh [WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022] allowed the petition filed by the assessee to seek reimbursement of the additional tax liability on implementation of the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before the GST regime. 

Facts

This petition has been filed by M/s GordhandasGobindram ("the Petitioner"), who was awarded a contract/work order by the Public Works Department, Raipur ("the Respondent") prior to the introduction of GST law. The Petitioner on account of the introduction of new GST law was required to pay certain additional tax liability, which the Petitioner now intends to get it refunded from the Respondent. 

The Petitioner submitted that the Respondent itself has taken a policy decision vide order dated October 10, 2018 ("Impugned Order") passed by the State Government to ensure the reimbursement of additional tax liability incurred by the contractors in respect of contracts, which were awarded prior to July 1, 2017 i.e. the date from which the GST law came into force.

Issue

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to seek reimbursement of additional GST liability imposed after the introduction of GST law?

Held

The Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court in WPC No. 5471 of 2022 held as under:

  • Relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s D.A. Enterprises v.State of Chhattisgarh [WPT No.94 of 2020 on November 17, 2022], wherein under identical set of facts the Court allowed the petition.
  • Permitted the Petitioner to approach the Respondent in terms of the Impugned Order. 
  • Directed the Petitioner to file a fresh claim and produce necessary proof of the additional tax liability incurred on account of the introduction of the GST law within a period of one week.
  • Further directed the Respondent, to scrutinize Petitioner’s fresh claim and take a decision within a further period of 90 days.
     
 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 273

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
21 July 2026
Chartered Accountant

Keshri & Associates

Thiruvananthapuram

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 18 July 2026
Senior Manager- Finance & Accounts

apricus india

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Felicity Adobe LLP

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Arvindkumar Maniar & Co.

Rajkot

CA

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
Accountant (Finance & Compliance)

TRIEYEZ

Kolkata

CA

View Details