Applicability of GST on Transportation Services by Rail on Eggs/hatcheries under the GST Act

Last updated: 27 November 2021
Quick Summary
This advance ruling from the Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling clarifies the applicability of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the transportation of eggs and hatcheries by rail. The ruling addresses whether these specific services fall under taxable categories within the GST Act, providing guidance for businesses involved in the poultry and related industries.

Court :
Centre The Principal Commissioner of Central Taxes, Bengaluru South GST Commissionerate, Bengaluru

Brief :
Whether eggs/hatcheries are classified under the Agricultural Produces/Products?

Citation :
KAR ADRG 55/2021

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING IN KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDASA ROAD GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009 
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 55/2021 Dated: 29.10.2021 
Present: 
1. Dr. M.P. Ravi Prasad Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes . . . Member (State) 
2. Sri. T. Kiran Reddy Joint Commissioner of Customs 86 Indirect Taxes 
. Member (Central) 

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement.

FAQ :

The ruling concerns the applicability of GST on transportation services for eggs and hatcheries provided by rail.

The ruling was issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling in Karnataka under the Goods and Services Tax Act.

The ruling is dated 29.10.2021.

The members were Dr. M.P. Ravi Prasad (Member, State) and Sri. T. Kiran Reddy (Member, Central).

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay
Published in GST
Views : 307
downloaded 270 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery
  2. Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act
  3. Show Cause Notice issued to a non-existent amalgamated company is void ab initio and cannot be saved by Section 87 of the CGST Act
  4. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  5. CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork
  6. CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation
  7. CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence
  8. CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents
  9. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  10. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member ARCHANAARCHANAPro Member Vimlesh kumarVimlesh kumarPro Member N N V SatishN N V SatishPro Member Bijoy MPouloseBijoy MPoulosePro Member venkanna settyvenkanna setty
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category