The Calcutta High Court has ruled that an appeal cannot be rejected simply because a physical copy of the order was not submitted within the deadline. In a case where an appellant filed their appeal electronically, the court found that rejecting it on the grounds of a missing physical copy was not valid. The High Court set aside the rejection and ordered the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on its merits.
Court :
Calcutta High Court
Brief :
The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Rama Shanker Modi v the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services tax and Central Excise [WPA 15639 of 2023 dated July 20, 2023] set aside the impugned order and held that mere non filing of order physically within the time limit cannot be a valid ground to rejection of appeal.
Citation :
WPA 15639 of 2023 dated July 20, 2023
The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Rama Shanker Modi v the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services tax and Central Excise [WPA 15639 of 2023 dated July 20, 2023] set aside the impugned order and held that mere non filing of order physically within the time limit cannot be a valid ground to rejection of appeal.
Facts
Mr. Rama Shanker Modi ("the Petitioner") was aggrieved by the order of the Adjudicating Authorityandfiled an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority vide an order dated May 01, 2023 ("the Impugned Order") dismissed the appeal of the Petitioner by stating that since the Petitioner had failed to produce the certified copy of the order which has been challenged and the appeal is time barred. However, the Petitioner has filed the appeal electronically before the Appellate Authority.
Aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Petitioner filed writ before the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court challenging the impugned order.
Issue
Whether the Revenue Department can reject the appeal merely on the ground that assessee has not filed physical copy of the order even though the order copy was filed electronically?
Held
The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in WPA 15639 of 2023 held as under:
- Observed that, the Petitioner was bonafide and made a mistake of not filing the appeal physically before the Appellate Authority within time.
- Held that, the Appellate Authority cannot rejected the appeal merely on the technical ground of not filing appeal physically before the authority without going into the merits.
- Set aside the impugned order and directed the Appellate Authority to accept the certified copy filed by the Petitioner beyond time and dispose the appeal in question in accordance with law and pass a speaking order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.
FAQ :
No, the Calcutta High Court has held that an appeal cannot be rejected merely on the ground that a physical copy of the order was not furnished within the time limit, especially if it was filed electronically.
Mr. Modi's appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Authority for failing to produce a certified copy of the order physically. He had filed the appeal electronically. The Calcutta High Court overturned this decision.
The High Court decided that the Appellate Authority should not reject an appeal on a technicality like the absence of a physical order copy without considering the case's merits.
The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to accept the certified copy filed by the appellant, even if it was beyond the usual time limit, and to dispose of the appeal properly after a hearing.