Why we have to verify debtors outstanding more than 180 days

8659 views 4 replies

All of us as a part of audit, verify and ask questions about outstanding debtors with the clients without knowing the concept and reson behind such verification. I will try to share my knowledge on this in a simple way.

We, generelly ask whether there are debtors oustanding more than 180 days and whether it is bad and to be written off. We will take an example of a company having 100 CR turnover, which will have marketing or sales persons operating for sales promotion. They bring in new customers, tie up them with the company and over a period of time as the sales order improves, company starts allowing them credit for 30 / 60 days. Now if the customer doesnt settle the account and if untraceable, company has to write off it as bad debt. Amount invloved may be around (apprx) 2 to 5 lakhs for that customer. 

Assume the same amount is bad in 5 branches of the company having 20 cr turbover (100 CR total), total comes around 10 to 20 lakhs. Sometimes company has no other go than writing off the debt. 

Now comes the actual question why we have to verify it. Out of 20 CR sales in a branch there will be 4-5 sales agents. And some agents having no ethics may offer the product to people known to them (but unknown to the company) may help them get the product on credit and may have some arrangements with them as pre planned. Company as a part of expansion may sometimes doesnt verify the background and without collateral sells the product on guarantee of the agent. 

If the company writes off the debt in preperation of financials, agents may take advantage and indulge in such unethical behaviours further more. And if the company easily writes off the debt it thinking that its bad, company will suffer loss which will have impact on profit and in turn on taxes. 

To avoid such practices, an audit is carried out with internal as well external confirmations. And any unusual transactions of such nature are questioned. 

Hope it was useful!

Replies (4)

Good effort made by you in giving your perspective.

Apart from what you mentioned above, it is imperative to understand that apart from ethics real business problems do exist and that’s when a debt turns bad. The aging classification is put into various buckets like 0-30, 31-60, 61-90, 91-180, 180-365 etc so as to aid the management to identify whether the debts can be recovered from particular customers.

If a debtors aging demonstrates that a company's receivables are being collected much slower than normal, this is a warning sign that business may be slowing down or that the company is taking greater credit risk in its sales practices.

As a management tool, debtors aging may indicate that certain customers are not good credit risks. It can therefore help a company make prudent decisions about whether or not to keep doing business with customers that are chronically late payers.


 

good effort...though satish makes more sense to me..mainly it affects the working capital, if u are a manufacturing concern..the operating cycle is extended and that leads into extra WC expense

Thank you Mr. Sathish. My intention was to make understand the articles when they go on a audit, and that is the reason i did not use technical words. Technical articles looks better though, actually may not help in easy understanding for all students.  

I appreciate and welcome your intention in helping students by writing in an easy language. Keep it up, students do require guidance from people like you who understand their practical difficulties.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register