Section 54F and Section 24 Query

Dear members,

I have specific queries on the applicability of Section 54F and Section 24 for the below situation.

Mr. A purchased a fully constructed apartment in March 2023 for INR 1.0Cr. He funded this through INR 80 lakhs bank loan and INR 20 lakhs from own funds. In addition, stamp duty of INR 10 lakhs was paid from own funds.

Mr. A sold some equity mutual funds in Jan 2024 for a net consideration of INR 1.35 Cr. The acquisition cost was INR 60 lakhs and LTCG was INR 75 lakhs.

  1. For availing Section 54F exemption, what should be cost of residential property to be considered: INR 1.0 Cr or INR 1.1 Cr (i.e., including stamp duty)?
  2. Can Mr. A claim the maximum possible deduction (i.e., 75*1.0/1.5 = 50 lakhs or 75*1.1/1.5 = 55 lakhs) in this case? If not, what is the deductible amount?
  3. If the loan is partly pre-paid say to the extent of INR 40 lakhs now, does the answer to Q2 change?
  4. Can Mr. A claim Section 24 (interest on home loan) deduction also in addition to Section 54F?

 

Thanks in Advance!

Krishna

Replies (2)
Quick Summary
This discussion explores the applicability of Section 54F and Section 24 of the Income Tax Act for a property purchase. The user seeks clarification on whether stamp duty should be included in the property cost for Section 54F exemption, the maximum deductible amount, and how loan pre-payment affects the deduction. Additionally, the user questions if Section 24 deductions for home loan interest can be claimed alongside Section 54F, and probes the eligibility of stamp duty for deductions under Section 80C.

1. 1.1
2. 55 l
3. no
4. yes, can be claimed only after purchase of construction of house. not before that

Thanks for the reply Sharath Chandra. 

On Q1) There is a view that tax exemption under Section 54F is not available for stamp duty and property registration costs. Instead, these costs are eligible for deduction, up to 1.5 lakhs, under Section 80C under the old tax regime. Is this right?

On Q2) Regarding allowing exemption on borrowed funds, there seem to cases favoring both sides:

• In favor of the IT Dept: Milan Sharad Ruparel v ACIT (2009) 27 SOT 61 (Mum)

• In favor of assesses: Bombay Housing Corporation v Asst. CIT (2002) 81 ITD 454 (Bom). Also in Mrs. Prema P. Shah, Sanjiv P. Shah v ITO (2006) 282 ITR (AT) 211 (Mumbai)

What is the right answer in this case?


 

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
07 October 2026
Senior Account Manager

Amplio Invest

Mumbai

M.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 September 2026
Industrial Trainee

Twenty Point Nine Five Ventures Private Limited

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
05 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Vision IT Peripherals Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
17 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

Dass Gupta & Associates

Gurgaon

CA

View Details
Company
15 September 2026
Client-site CA associate

Aditya Muley and Co

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Chartered Accountant - Internal Audit

HKC | Chartered Accountants & Business Advisors

Ludhiana

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details