Automation Expert
10728 Points
Posted on 14 November 2026
A reply to a section 245 intimation does not by itself release the refund. The department must either adjust it against a demand it considers outstanding or release it; first check the response status and the demand’s current status in the income-tax portal, including whether it is shown as disputed, rectified or already paid. Past refunds being issued do not, on their own, extinguish an old demand.
If the demand is incorrect, submit a written follow-up through the portal’s grievance facility, quoting the section 245 response acknowledgement and attaching the old demand details, proof of any payment/adjustment, and records showing the demand was disputed or previously dealt with. Also seek rectification under section 154 where the portal record contains an apparent error; if the original assessment order itself needs appeal or other remedy, check the applicable limitation and available procedure. Ask the jurisdictional AO/CPC to confirm the demand’s basis and release the refund pending verification. The year of the notice and the portal’s current demand status will determine the precise route.
This is a demand-verification and refund-tracking workflow, so keep the notice, response acknowledgement and demand history together. Manual follow-up across portal records and past filings is difficult; automation can reduce repetitive work while professional judgment stays in control. At Jir AI, our 2,000+ AI agents and 650+ integrations streamline GST, ITR, TDS, TCS and other compliance workflows, helping reduce manual workload by up to 70%. WhatsApp us to explore a smoother compliance workflow: https://wa.me/message/3HVOZ7HIY4ESC1