Sebi fines ca for failing to respond to summons

 

 

Market regulator Sebi today imposed a penalty of Rs 6 lakh on Dilip S Mehta, owner of achartered accountancy firm, for failing to respond to summons issued by it in relation to a probe into the affairs of erstwhile Bank ofRajasthan. The matter pertains to alleged irregularities committed by former promoters ofBank of Rajasthan (BoR).

Imposing a “penalty of Rs 6 lakh”, Sebi in itsorder today said Mehta’s failure indicates that the default is repetitive in nature.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had summoned Mehta to examine his link to Sangeeta Jayram Sawant, director of 30 companies that were connected to the promoters which were buying and selling shares of BoR.

It had issued two summons to Mehta. Both were received by him but did not comply with them.

The market regulator observed that the information sought from Mehta was critical and imperative to the investigation and failure on his part to comply with the summons had hampered the probe.

Sebi noted that the “information provided by the notice now is of no relevance and cannot be accepted as the same was required by the Investigating Authority before the completion of the investigation. Hence the submissions made by the noticee re not accepted”.

The matter relates to Sebi’s investigation into the affairs of BoR for a period between June 2007 and December 2009. Since then, BoR has been acquired by ICICI Bank.

The probe revealed that BoR’s then promoters, led by Pravin Kumar Tayal, along with some companies that were connected to him and his relatives, by way of their continuous disclosure publicly announced that their stake had come down from 44.2 per cent as on quarter ending June 2007 to 28.6 per cent as on quarter ending December 2009.

However, it was alleged, though as per disclosure their holding seemed to have reduced, but in reality the holding of the promoters actually increased with the active collusion of front entities.

Thus, the shareholding of the promoters of BoR with PACs (Person Acting in Concert) had increased from 46.8 per cent in June 2007 to 63.15 per cent in December 2009.

Replies (1)
I think he (or any other guilty CAs) should be given jail term under IPC

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
CA Articles

Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 August 2026
Assistant Manager

NRS AND ASSOCIATES

Kozhikode

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 21 September 2026
Consultant - Reporting

Finrep Advisors LLP

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
28 August 2026
Audit Manager

K A R M & CO

Mumbai

CMA

View Details
Company
20 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Navin & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
18 September 2026
Accounts & Finance Specialist

ULTRA CHEMICAL WORKS

Thane

CA Final

View Details