Originally posted by : Shweta
|
|
But i think mistake is an arithmetical error.. The income shown under balance sheet is Rs.9 lakh lessor than the actual figure... Hence we are liable for a refund of Rs.50000... We also recd an intimation u/s 143(1). The figure quoted in the balance sheet in the return shows 9 lakh more than the income shown under PGBP..Pls advice
|
|
Mrs. Freny Rashid Chenai v. ACED [1973] 90 ITR 31 (AP).
(Taxmann’s Direct Taxes Manual, Vol. 3.)
The mistakes that can be rectified under section 154, are those which are ‘apparent from the record’ and not merely the arithmetical/clerical errors. There can be no doubt that a clerical or an arithmetical error would amount to a mistake apparent from the record. It is immaterial as to how the mistake occurred, or who was responsible for it. A mistake apparent from the record is a mistake that is manifest, plain or obvious, a mistake that can be realised without a debate or dissertation. A mistake which can be discovered by a process of elucidation or argument or a debate, cannot be considered to be a mistake apparent from the record. The scope of the expression ‘mistake apparent from the record’ is much wider than the expression ‘mistake apparent on the face of the record’.
So you can go for 154. Because, its purely Mistake upon which two views are not possible... So apply for 154.. :)