Nov 11 - indirect tax paper review

Final 5290 views 36 replies

Unexpected pattern!

25 marks numericals surely caught me off my guard!

I thought DT syllabus was bigger than IDT, but i was grossly wrong! couldn't finish the syllabus.

 

Case laws were a boon; but i am not sure about the numericals!

I don't care for now; time to take a well deserved break before Jan!

Replies (36)

Unexpected pattern!

25 marks numericals surely caught me off my guard!

I thought DT syllabus was bigger than IDT, but i was grossly wrong! couldn't finish the syllabus.

 

Case laws were a boon; but i am not sure about the numericals!

I don't care for now; time to take a well deserved break before Jan!

Originally posted by : aNkuR jAin....................

yr in Q 1a 

120Lacs of removal of other assessee......

need not to be considered na????

No it shall be considered...

NOW

BEST OF LUCK

&

ALL THE BEST

FRIENDS V NEED BOTH

Ya Ankur, 120 vil not be considered while calculating exemption but yet it vil play role in deciding whether MNO LTD is SSI or not It is not SSI
i had done silly mistakes in quoting caselaw names!!!
Originally posted by : aNkuR jAin....................

yr in Q 1a 

120Lacs of removal of other assessee......

need not to be considered na????

it is to be considered there was a same ques in practice manual

Paper was very nice to score more marks.......

It should be considered as for purpose of calculating AVC, clearence by one or more manufacturers from a single premises should bo considered....

Paper of ITL was easy for practical problem ,

amendment was very easy ,

but most of theory was based on case law.

name of case law was dificult to remember.

The GR II CA Final papers were easy compared to May11

Hope everybody might have done well.

 

Regards,

Viswanathan.C.P

The GRII -CA Final papers we easy compared to last terms,

Hope everybody must have done well.

 

Viswanathan.C.P

Q1.a. 470 

b. 45650

c.25L

d.CST=12000.

e.553405.

are they correct??

can anybody tell wat abt 1st question a part annual production capacity and retail sale price....

I have assumed its excisable and hence added. 

can anybody tell wat abt 1st question a part annual production capacity and retail sale price....

I have assumed its excisable and hence added. 

indirect Paper was not so typical one. It was a moderate level paper.

However it was case oriented.

dont know from where they given the case laws.

i was aware abt one case law only- Tarpaulin International limited.

but it was not a lenghty one.

wish for best carrier life all my CA Student Friends

thanks


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register