seriously I don't have any idea how my exams are going... once have a feeling that i'll clear all my exams widout any doubt... and another minute... just the reversal... just want that I become CA that's it... its my last group... about DT exam... I hope that it went good... still the result will tell... ;)
Menu
Nov 11 - direct tax paper review *_*
Replies (48)
seriously I don't have any idea how my exams are going... once have a feeling that i'll clear all my exams widout any doubt... and another minute... just the reversal... just want that I become CA that's it... its my last group... about DT exam... I hope that it went good... still the result will tell... ;)
well....no doubt it ws a good paper...bt cant say anythng....
all depends upon d marking & silly mistakes in hidden points which many of us hv committed...
lets hope 4 d best...
one more to go....good luck everybody.....
THERE WERE LOTS OF SMALL HIDDEN POINTS IN PRACTICAL QUESTIONS!!!???
ITS BETTER NOT TO DISCUSS NOW! THE VARIOUS FACULTIES ARE DIFFERING IN THE OPNION - EXAMPLE - BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION - THOUGH IT IS BASED ON THE DECISION OF P&H HIGH COURT IN CASE OF SMT NEENA JAIN (GIVEN IN RTP) BUT SOME FACULTIES ARE OF THE OPINION IT IS TAXABLE AS LAND!!!
BAD DEBTS ALLOWED - CASE LAW TRF LTD REFER ICAI CASE LAW BOOK LET
HIGH COURT CAN NOT REVIEW ITS DECISION - REFER CASE LAW IN ICAI BOOKLET
AIRLINE LANDING & PARKING CHARGES - TDS APPLICABLE - DELHI HIGH COURT - JAPAN AIR LINES AND UNITED AIRLINES CASE
AUDIT QUERY - NOT A VALID GROUND FOR NOTICE UNDER SEC 148 - AO HAS REASON TO BELIEVE ON ITS OWN
COMMI CAN USE HIS POWER U/S 263
LIQ DAMAGES - RTP & CASE LAW BOOKLET OF ICAI - SOURASHTRA CEMENT CASE - CAPITAL RECEIPT
Q 7a - allmost same question in rtp - preconstruction repayment of principle amt not eligible as ded u/s 80C
repayment of loan to relative - not allowed as ded u/s 80C
ppf in the name of mother not allowed as ded
44AD - PARTNERSHIP - SALARY & INT ALLOWABLE FROM 8% PRESUMPTIVE INCOME
ALSO B/F BUSINESS LOSS N UNABSORBED DEP CAN BE SET OFF
NO ADV TAX LIABILITY HENCE 234 B & C NOT ATTRACTED
Q 6D 1 - ITAT - DIFF OF OPINION - TO BE REF TO PRESIDENT OF TRIBUNAL - OTHER MEMBERS WILL HEAR D CASE AND ALL WILL DECIDE BY MAJORITY
| Originally posted by : Ghanshyam Joshi | ||
 |
44AD - PARTNERSHIP - SALARY & INT ALLOWABLE FROM 8% PRESUMPTIVE INCOME ALSO B/F BUSINESS LOSS N UNABSORBED DEP CAN BE SET OFF NO ADV TAX LIABILITY HENCE 234 B & C NOT ATTRACTED |
 |
Sir,
Business losses will be allowed to be adjusted against the Income of 8% but same is not in case of Unabsorbed depreciation as it falls under section 32. whereas section 44AD does not provide for any expenses falling under section 30 to 38.
THE BUSINESS LOSS AND UNABSORBED DEP WERE OF PREVIOUS YEAR IN WHICH THE ASSESSEE HAD NOT OPTED FOR 44AD.
CHECK THE PROVISIONS OF SET OFF OF UNABSORBED DEP OF PREVIOUS YEAR AFTER IDT PAPER - IT CAN BE SET OFF
What is the answer of Q.2. mine is 1,63,50,000.
loss of p&m reduce block of asset is not correct in Q-2 because no money is received it will remain in block for which depreciation will be available (Check recent case laws)
@ sanjay Oh. . :-(
and yes i think another mistake i made is regarding unabsorbed dep. . It can be set off coz assessee had not opt 44AD in last year.
Recent Threads
- Registration as deductor on traces site
- Rental Income from a Joint Holding property
- Itr 4 return filing question
- Whether GST applicable on Hardship Compensation pa
- ITC cannot be denied to Bona Fide Buyers for Suppl
- Unused ITC for Hotel after GST Change
- CA FINAL SPOM
- 44ad presumption of tax
- Friendly loan to blood relative?
- Tds penalty for in operative pans
Related Threads
CAclubindia
