May 2015 SFM CA Final exams

Page no : 2

CA S P khakural (Job) (55 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

So bad ..........icai kya mazak kr rha hai studentsk sath

Milan Gupta (article assistant) (61 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

Average paper and much easier than last one

Rahul Jha (Student) (52 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

2 din diya thaa uska kasar nikal diya....

rishabh oswal (n.a) (85 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

Pass krna hi nhi tho exam hi kiyu lete hai.....

Vinay (Articled Assistant) (198 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

compared to earlier papers managable.. but coz lengthy FR many students ve lost interest in other subjects includin me.. in ca exams first paper of d grp always imp n its impact on other papers are high..

manik (no designation) (40 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

Very very v v v difficult

Shalini (none) (105 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

I'm still trying to comprehend the leasing decision question... For me choice was easy chucked 6th question.. Couldn't understand both the parts.

Anshdha Rathore (Student) (28 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

Questions easy sirf dikh rahe the first 15 min me...jab karne lage to.pata chala andar to pata ni kya kya puch rakha tha..kuch to bohat zyada ajeeb the

CA. Bhavik P. Chudasama (Practice) (3677 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

In shrt lag gyi he full too.. Started preparing for 1st grp agn..koi sense hi nai he yaar itna padhke sala

Shalini (none) (105 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

@ megha bansal..yeah a bad joke.

HIMANSHU (STUDENT) (35 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

Easy but twisted paper

Anshdha Rathore (Student) (28 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

I'm feeling like leaving this time... Baki papers dene ka matlab hi nahi jab aggregate hi nahi hone wala

Manya Agarwal (studying ) (23 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

Is anyone expecting above 80%?

Sourabh (Student) (360 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

very tough

kinjal jain (article) (30 Points)
Replied 05 May 2015

the bond sum second part dint make sense to me how r v suppose ro calculate interest rates for on 31/3 and 31/10????? dat calculation should have carried another 8mks!!!