CA in Practice
1340 Points
Joined September 2013
Just beacuse the department people has issued letter (2A vs 3B) indicating it is excess claim of ITC it will not actually become excess availement of ITC. Unless, the receiver taken ITC without any document, goods or services.
Merely due to the fault of the supplier, the recipient shall not be penalised.
Currently credit can be taken on provisional basis as per Section 41 of CGST Act. Once the matching provisions are implemented to say that the credit can be taken only after payment of tax by the supplier, then there is question of interest for excess availment of ITC.