I-T DEPT MOVES COURT OVER ITAT's MARICO DIRECTIVE

The Income-Tax department is at loggerheads with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the ultimate fact-finding body on tax disputes, over the latter’s demand for verifying the reasons for conducting a raid on FMCG major Marico Industries. ITAT had directed the department to produce the “satisfaction note”, which is an internal document prepared by income tax officers, who plan to conduct a raid. It is this note that ITAT wants to have a look at. The department sees this as an intrusion into its domain. The Income-Tax department, which feels that the satisfaction note is a part of its administrative procedure, has moved the Bombay High Court challenging the jurisdiction of the ITAT to issue such directives to the department. The matter will be heard next month. The department apprehends that if ITAT is allowed to have its way, the department will lose its functional independence on tax raids and surveys, which, until now, has been its sole prerogative. Checks and balances are built into the system, the department pointed out. A satisfaction note explains why an entity needs to be raided and the department’s reasons for presuming that income has escaped the tax net or the possibility of that happening if not checked in time. It also gives reasons for why a raid is considered the best action under the given circumstances. The note is then submitted to the additional director of investigation and then the investigation director. The ultimate authority that approves the note is the director general of investigation, an officer of the rank of chief commissioner. – www.economictimes.indiatimes.com

Replies (2)

nice yaar

Various powers has been given to tax authorities on satisfaction of the conditions of "reason to believe". Use of this term in the legislativ act is not perfunctory. However, the question is not raised in due to general priciple of law that even illegally collected evidence is a valid evidence.

However, courts has power to examine the satsfaction of "reason to believe". Further, if privacy of individual has been violated, it is a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and can be challenged in Writ court, independent of Income Tax proceeding. I am sure with development of legal awareness, many officers conducting raid on frivolous grounds may end up defending themselves in civil proceeding for comoensation.

New enactments prescribe a very heavy penalty for vextious search and seizure even on public officials. For the first time in Prevention of Money Laundering Act, an imprisonment of three years has been enacted for vexous search and seizure. Things are changing, and those who are not attuned to future may find themselves in soup.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
09 September 2026
SENIOR AUDITOR & ACCOUNTS MANAGER

Anupam Parashar & Co.

Ghaziabad

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
Article Assistant

MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
15 September 2026
Client-site CA associate

Aditya Muley and Co

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Semi-Qualified Assitant

Subrahmanyam & Sivudu CA Firm

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
Featured 11 September 2026
Audit Executive

RBSM Corporate Advisors Private Limited

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 September 2026
Junior Accountant

J S P M & Associates LLP

Pune

B.Com

View Details