Automation Expert
10733 Points
Posted on 14 November 2026
Do not submit AOC-4 with comparative figures altered merely to pass validation. For FY 2024–25, the comparative figures should ordinarily relate to FY 2023–24; figures for FY 2022–23 appearing instead suggest the form’s financial-period mapping or prefill may be wrong. The “invalid financial year” message may also indicate that the selected period or AOC-4 form variant does not match the company’s approved financial statements.
- Recheck the company’s financial-year start and end dates, AGM/extension details, and the period selected in the form; confirm that the financial statements are for the same period.
- Download a fresh AOC-4 from MCA and retry after clearing the old draft, using the latest available form utility. Check whether the correct comparative figures appear before signing.
- If the error persists, raise a fresh MCA service request with the SRN, CIN, exact error text, form version, and screenshots showing the selected period and prefilled figures. Retain the ticket and avoid filing with incorrect comparatives; escalate through the MCA grievance channel if the technical issue remains unresolved.
This is a form-validation issue that sits within the financial-statement approval and filing workflow. Manual checking and correction across filings is difficult; automation can reduce repetitive work while keeping professional review and judgment in control. At Jir AI, our 2,000+ AI agents and 650+ integrations streamline GST, ITR, TDS, TCS and other compliance workflows, helping reduce manual workload by up to 70%. For details, message us on WhatsApp: https://wa.me/message/3HVOZ7HIY4ESC1