i think it was easy & not so much technical calculations were asked.
what do you think??
i think it was easy & not so much technical calculations were asked.
what do you think??
It was average for me !!!!!!!
LAW PAPER WAS QUITE GOOD
ALLIED LAW WAS ASKED TOTALLY FROM PREVIOUS EXAMINATIONS
OVERALL CA FINAL PAPER
Gud standard paper....
institute broke d past trends....
hey guys tel me the ans of that FEMA Qus residefntial status of Mr Bhattcharyya...????
plz anyone upload the paper
less from directors....
and what is from that qus of Royal Bank...?? is it of Sec 372A...??
@ arvind mr bhattcharya wud be PRI....
your ans is not seems correct... because qus is asking about residential status during Financial Year 2010-2011 and nothing is given about FY 2009-10...
@ Arvind
Mr.Bhattacharya is PROI...
& in Ques.2..Its not 372A its frm Sec.293 i Think...
| Originally posted by : Mayank Ahuja | ||
 |
@ Arvind Mr.Bhattacharya is PROI... & in Ques.2..Its not 372A its frm Sec.293 i Think... |
 |
Agree.
hmmmmmmmm....
as in FEMA QUESTION no info was given about FY 2009-10 BUT IN FY 2010 HE RESIDED IN INDIA FOR 180 DAYS & THEN WENT ABROAD
IT APPEARS THAT HE WAS RESIDING IN INDIA FOR MORE THAN 182DAYS IN INDIA IN FY 2009-10
HENCE HE MUST BE PRI.
CORRECT ME IF IA AM WRONG !
Karia Overseas
Ahmedabad
CA
View Details
R P S K & Associates
Nashik
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
