How was Law Paper (CA Final) ?????

Final 4817 views 55 replies

ya sushant is corect

Replies (55)

ya sushant is corect

Sushant your ans is perfect....

ya sushant is correct...for safety i had written that taking assumption that mr. bhattacharya was residing for more than 182 days in previous year.2009-10...he wud be PRI immaterial of his current year status..

the answer of Royal bank is of sec 293 n not frm 372

abhishek sir mr. b shud b PROI  as he is residing for less than d limit of 182 days....nd overall the paper was above standard nd bit unexpected

Ya Paper was easy!

can anyone download todays law paper of ca final exams?

16 marks out of course. ICAI notified in Feb that it will ask on winding up only covered in module 9.4 topic but it asked from other. What institute trying to do. It should give full marks in those questions

kapil how could u give avg paper .did not u study law?

Originally posted by : Mayank
16 marks out of course. ICAI notified in Feb that it will ask on winding up only covered in module 9.4 topic but it asked from other. What institute trying to do. It should give full marks in those questions  

mayank I wish ICAI was as generous as U..

but dey ve managed 2 screw us up.. as known paper was unpredictable but for me it ws frustrating..after reading a lot..output is or ll be bad :( 

i agree with sumit.

what about the winding up questions

will they add marks

costing theory...

 

/forum/final-costing-theory-analysis-in-1-page-vvi-143221.asp

overall paper was good.. Bt the questions ask for winding up and the amalgamation definately give a chance to icai deduct as mch as marks they want by not asking the technical question.. So b ready for a scaling ...

 

For VVI costing theory- refer this forum....

/forum/final-costing-theory-analysis-in-1-page-vvi-143221.asp


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register