HOW WAS LAW ?

Paper was too lengthy

(3) contract of indemnity

i think anser is contract of guarantee

see Revision test paper Q 2 (b) (i)

 ans for 1 a??

paper was nt at all lengthy..standard paper

bt case studies r little bit tufff

overall gud paper

i think contention of A is not valid.as per deed she have to pay Rs 2000 to B.

contraccte of guraantee

 ans for 1 c iii

(3) valid
 

PE II law was a good paper ,,, not may complex conceps were asked but more care was give a small small provision which we dont think will come in the exam .... overall a easy ... easy 60 marks paper ... from last 3 attemps more practical question are asked ... same happened today too

just one word --

CONCEPTUAL

 pe-ii law paper was fine..

i think it is contract of imdemnity; as in question there is no word about some debt,giving guarantee. Imdenity because once in one prior pcc/pe2 exam; they ave asked about "how is insurance different from imdemnity"? The answer was insurance protects us from damages from 3 rd parties inclduing acts of god; but imdenity only damages from the imdenifier and the 3 rd parties.