Vivek is correct. The date on which the winding up petition is initiated is the date to be recokned. So as per your example, the person who ceased to be a member on 5th has no liability whereas the person who ceased to be a member on 10th is liabile.
Menu
How is one year to be reckoned in the given provision?
I missed one point. Practically, most companies are companies limited by share capital. In such companies, generally we don't find unpaid share capital and hence there is nothing due from members.
| Originally posted by : Rasesh | ||
 |
Vivek is correct. The date on which the winding up petition is initiated is the date to be recokned. So as per your example, the person who ceased to be a member on 5th has no liability whereas the person who ceased to be a member on 10th is liabile. |
 |
I am not convinced because ' one year' is not the same as 'period of one year' and,mind it,in many sections of the companies act 'period of such and such year' has been used.
Anyone?
Recent Threads
- TDS - requirement of TDS by individual under presu
- Built a tool to automate Bank Statement to Tally e
- Normal Register in GST in delhi in gujarat no rece
- ITC availment relationship
- Challan confusion in ITR B block return
- U/s 23 (2)(a) and 23 (2)(b)
- Building a Strong Financial Foundation: Key Accoun
- Long Term Capital Gains for shares
- Hiring Company Secretary Manager with 2 Years of P
- Updated Return _ Deduction
Related Threads
CAclubindia
